In Control, the Core i3-4160T is slightly faster than the Core i5-650. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 247 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 4 years and 6 months newer – Jul 21, 2014 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 4 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 35 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Core i5-650
No clear advantages
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $176.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
