In Atomfall, the Core i3-4160T is slightly faster than the Core i5-2500K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 197 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer – Jul 21, 2014 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Core i5-2500K
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-2500K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-2500K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-2500K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-2500K Jan 9th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | $216.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
