In Atomfall, the Core i3-4160T is slightly slower than the Core i5-13420H. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i5-13420H
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall – 225 vs 196 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-13420H: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-13420H in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-13420H in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-13420H
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13420H Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | Intel BGA 1744 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
