In Deathloop, the Core i3-4160T is slightly slower than the Core i5-12400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-12400F
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 228 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Is 7 years and 5 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 7 years and 5 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-12400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
228 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
171 FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-12400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i5-12400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
18 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12400F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $174.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
