In Tom Clancy's The Division 2, the Core i3-4160T is much slower than the Core i3-14100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 35 vs 58 Watts
- Consumes up to 40% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 205% faster in Tom Clancy's The Division 2 – 113 vs 37 FPS
- Up to 205% faster in Tom Clancy's The Division 2
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer
Tom Clancy's The Division 2 FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160T vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
113 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160T vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160T
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160T Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
