In Atomfall, the Core i3-4160 is slower than the Ryzen 5 9600X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $169 cheaper!
Core i3-4160
- Up to 87% cheaper – $24.99 vs $194.00
- Up to 87% cheaper
- Up to 84% better value in Atomfall – $0.12 vs $0.77/FPS
- Up to 84% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Ryzen 5 9600X
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall – 250 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 18 days newer – Aug 08, 2024 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 10 years and 18 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160 vs Ryzen 5 9600X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Average FPS
202 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
81%
Price, $
$24.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Average FPS
250 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
187 FPS
100%
Price, $
$194
12%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
16%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160 vs Ryzen 5 9600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160 vs Ryzen 5 9600X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160 Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 9600X Aug 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Aug 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $279.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM5 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
