In Rust, the Core i3-4160 is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $535 cheaper!
Core i3-4160
- Up to 96% cheaper – $24.99 vs $560.00
- Up to 96% cheaper
- Up to 94% better value in Rust – $0.11 vs $1.97/FPS
- Up to 94% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 31% faster in Rust – 284 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 31% faster in Rust
- Is 10 years and 5 months newer – Jan 15, 2025 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 10 years and 5 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160 vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Average FPS
217 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
51%
Price, $
$24.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 15th, 2025
Average FPS
284 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
94 FPS
100%
Price, $
$560
4%
Value, $/FPS
$1.97/FPS
6%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 15th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160 Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 15th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Jan 15th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1851 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
