In Control, the Core i3-4160 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 5 245K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $205 cheaper!
Core i3-4160
- Up to 89% cheaper – $24.99 vs $229.89
- Up to 89% cheaper
- Up to 89% better value in Control – $0.10 vs $0.90/FPS
- Up to 89% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 54 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Core Ultra 5 245K
- Up to 3% faster in Control – 255 vs 248 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Control
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160 vs Core Ultra 5 245K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Average FPS
248 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
97%
Price, $
$24.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
255 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.89
10%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
11%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160 vs Core Ultra 5 245K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160 Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $319.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1851 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
