The Core i3-4160 is a slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-7700, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $82.52 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-4160
- Up to 81% cheaper – $19.98 vs $102.50
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-7700
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Core i3-4160 vs Core i7-7700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Average FPS
179
96%
Min 1% FPS
119
97%
Price, $
$19.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Core i7-7700
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, $
$102.5
19%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
20%
Core i3-4160 vs Core i7-7700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160 vs Core i7-7700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160 vs Core i7-7700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-7700
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-4160 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-7700 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
3 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |