In Elden Ring, the Core i3-4160 is same performance as the Core i5-9400F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $95 cheaper!
Core i3-4160
- Up to 79% cheaper – $24.99 vs $119.99
- Up to 79% cheaper
- Up to 80% better value in Elden Ring – $0.18 vs $0.88/FPS
- Up to 80% better value in Elden Ring
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-9400F
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
Elden Ring FPS Calculator
Core i3-4160 vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Average FPS
136 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
98%
Price, $
$24.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
136 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
100 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
20%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
20%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160 vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160 vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4160 Jul 21st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
54W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
