In Dead Space, the Core i3-4150T is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2667 v3. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4150T
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 35 vs 135 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space – 175 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space
- Is 4 months and 8 days newer – Sep 08, 2014 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 4 months and 8 days newer
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs Xeon E5-2667 v3: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
174 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
89 FPS
98%
Price, $
$21.76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Xeon E5-2667 v3 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Xeon E5-2667 v3 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2667 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | $2,057.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 135 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
