In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-4150T is slightly faster than the Xeon E5-1680 v2. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4150T
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 186 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 7 months and 19 days newer – May 01, 2014 vs Sep 10, 2013
- Is 7 months and 19 days newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-1680 v2
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs Xeon E5-1680 v2: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
186 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
139 FPS
100%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Xeon E5-1680 v2 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Xeon E5-1680 v2 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5-1680 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-1680 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Released | Sep 10th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | $1,723.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA2011 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
