In Deathloop, the Core i3-4150T is slightly slower than the Phenom II X6 1045T. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $33 cheaper!
Core i3-4150T
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – May 01, 2014 vs Sep 01, 2010
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 55% cheaper – $26.99 vs $59.77
- Up to 55% cheaper
- Up to 54% better value in Deathloop – $0.12 vs $0.26/FPS
- Up to 54% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Phenom II X6 1045T
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 224 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs Phenom II X6 1045T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
219 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
98%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Phenom II X6 1045T
Sep 1st, 2010
Average FPS
224 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.77
45%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
46%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Phenom II X6 1045T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Phenom II X6 1045T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Phenom II X6 1045T
Sep 1st, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Phenom II X6 1045T Sep 1st, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Released | Sep 1st, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR2), 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
