In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-4150T is slightly slower than the FX-9370. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4150T
- Is 10 months and 19 days newer – May 01, 2014 vs Jun 11, 2013
- Is 10 months and 19 days newer
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 35 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
FX-9370
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 195 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs FX-9370: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
185 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
139 FPS
95%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs FX-9370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs FX-9370 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-9370 Jun 11th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Released | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM3+ |
35 W | Power Consumption | 220 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
