In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-4150T is slightly slower than the FX-4350. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $56 cheaper!
Core i3-4150T
- Is 1 year and 1 day newer – May 01, 2014 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 1 year and 1 day newer
- Up to 67% cheaper – $26.99 vs $82.71
- Up to 67% cheaper
- Up to 66% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.14 vs $0.41/FPS
- Up to 66% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
FX-4350
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 198 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs FX-4350: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
185 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
138 FPS
93%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
198 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.71
32%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
34%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs FX-4350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs FX-4350 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Released | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM3+ |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
