In Atomfall, the Core i3-4150T is slower than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4150T
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 35 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Up to 25% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 197 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
197 FPS
80%
Min 1% FPS
147 FPS
80%
Price, $
$21.76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
