In Control, the Core i3-4150T is same performance as the Core i9-9820X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $592 cheaper!
Core i3-4150T
- Up to 96% cheaper – $26.99 vs $619.25
- Up to 96% cheaper
- Up to 96% better value in Control – $0.10 vs $2.49/FPS
- Up to 96% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 35 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 79% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-9820X
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs Core i9-9820X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
247 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
99%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Core i9-9820X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$619.25
4%
Value, $/FPS
$2.49/FPS
4%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i9-9820X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i9-9820X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
18%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9820X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9820X Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $889.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA2066 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
