In Rust, the Core i3-4150T is slightly slower than the Core i9-7920X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $220 cheaper!
Core i3-4150T
- Up to 89% cheaper – $26.99 vs $246.65
- Up to 89% cheaper
- Up to 89% better value in Rust – $0.12 vs $1.07/FPS
- Up to 89% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 35 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 75% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-7920X
- Up to 7% faster in Rust – 230 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Rust
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Sep 10, 2017 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs Core i9-7920X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
214 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
79%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
58 FPS
100%
Price, $
$246.65
10%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
11%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i9-7920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i9-7920X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
18%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-7920X Sep 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Sep 10th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $1,199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA2066 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
