In Deathloop, the Core i3-4150T is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900KS. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $668 cheaper!
Core i3-4150T
- Up to 96% cheaper – $26.99 vs $695.00
- Up to 96% cheaper
- Up to 96% better value in Deathloop – $0.12 vs $2.82/FPS
- Up to 96% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 35 vs 150 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
Core i9-14900KS
- Up to 13% faster in Deathloop – 246 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Deathloop
- Is 9 years and 10 months newer – Mar 14, 2024 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 9 years and 10 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs Core i9-14900KS: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
218 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
89%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900KS
Mar 14th, 2024
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$695
3%
Value, $/FPS
$2.82/FPS
4%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i9-14900KS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i9-14900KS in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900KS
Mar 14th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KS Mar 14th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Mar 14th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $689.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
