In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-4150T is much slower than the Core i9-14900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $431 cheaper!
Core i3-4150T
- Up to 95% cheaper – $21.76 vs $452.68
- Up to 95% cheaper
- Up to 90% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.34 vs $3.32/FPS
- Up to 90% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 112% faster in Battlefield 6 – 136 vs 64 FPS
- Up to 112% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
64 FPS
47%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
47%
Price, $
$21.76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
136 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
102 FPS
100%
Price, $
$452.68
4%
Value, $/FPS
$3.32/FPS
10%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
