In Ready or Not, the Core i3-4150T is slightly slower than the Core i9-12900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4150T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-12900KF
- Up to 7% faster in Ready or Not – 332 vs 309 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Ready or Not
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer
Ready or Not FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs Core i9-12900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
309 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
84 FPS
63%
Price, $
$21.76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
![Intel Core i9 [12th Gen] i9-12900KF Hexadeca-core [16 Core] 3.20 GHz Processor - OEM Pack](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B09LMQ7XGX.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i9-12900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i9-12900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900KF Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
