The Core i3-4150T is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-4150T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-10900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 4 threads
Core i3-4150T vs Core i9-10900F
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
191
91%
Min 1% FPS
132
92%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
209
100%
Min 1% FPS
143
100%
Price, $
$249.2
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-4150T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $464.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
