In Rust, the Core i3-4150T is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $220 cheaper!
Core i3-4150T
- Up to 89% cheaper – $26.99 vs $247.30
- Up to 89% cheaper
- Up to 89% better value in Rust – $0.12 vs $1.06/FPS
- Up to 89% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 8% faster in Rust – 232 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
214 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
78%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
232 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
59 FPS
100%
Price, $
$247.3
10%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
11%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
