In Atomfall, the Core i3-4150T is slightly slower than the Core i7-4770K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $128 cheaper!
Core i3-4150T
- Is 10 months and 28 days newer – May 01, 2014 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 10 months and 28 days newer
- Up to 83% cheaper – $26.99 vs $154.88
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 83% better value in Atomfall – $0.13 vs $0.75/FPS
- Up to 83% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 35 vs 84 Watts
- Consumes up to 58% less energy
Core i7-4770K
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall – 206 vs 196 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs Core i7-4770K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
196 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
147 FPS
95%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Core i7-4770K
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
206 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
154 FPS
100%
Price, $
$154.88
17%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
17%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i7-4770K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i7-4770K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-4770K
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4770K Jun 2nd, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Released | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | $350.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 84 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
