In Atomfall, the Core i3-4150T is slightly faster than the Core i7-3610QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4150T
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 196 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 7 days newer – May 01, 2014 vs Apr 23, 2012
- Is 2 years and 7 days newer
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i7-3610QM
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs Core i7-3610QM: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
196 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
147 FPS
100%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i7-3610QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i7-3610QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-3610QM
Apr 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-3610QM Apr 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $378.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
35 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
