In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-4150T is slightly slower than the Core i7-2960XM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4150T
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer – May 01, 2014 vs Sep 04, 2011
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 35 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core i7-2960XM
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 193 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs Core i7-2960XM: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
185 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
139 FPS
96%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i7-2960XM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i7-2960XM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-2960XM
Sep 4th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-2960XM Sep 4th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Released | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | $1,096.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
35 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
