In Rust, the Core i3-4150T is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $303 cheaper!
Core i3-4150T
- Up to 92% cheaper – $26.99 vs $329.95
- Up to 92% cheaper
- Up to 91% better value in Rust – $0.12 vs $1.40/FPS
- Up to 91% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 10% faster in Rust – 235 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Rust
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
214 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
45 FPS
74%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
235 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
8%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
9%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
