In Atomfall, the Core i3-4150T is slightly slower than the Core i5-9600K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $121 cheaper!
Core i3-4150T
- Up to 82% cheaper – $26.99 vs $148.08
- Up to 82% cheaper
- Up to 81% better value in Atomfall – $0.13 vs $0.69/FPS
- Up to 81% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Core i5-9600K
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 213 vs 198 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs Core i5-9600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
198 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
92%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
213 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$148.08
18%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
19%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i5-9600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i5-9600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9600K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
