In Deathloop, the Core i3-4150T is same performance as the Core i5-9400F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $93 cheaper!
Core i3-4150T
- Up to 78% cheaper – $26.99 vs $119.99
- Up to 78% cheaper
- Up to 78% better value in Deathloop – $0.12 vs $0.54/FPS
- Up to 78% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-9400F
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
220 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
22%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
22%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
