In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-4150T is slightly slower than the Core i5-650. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $36 cheaper!
Core i3-4150T
- Is 4 years and 3 months newer – May 01, 2014 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 4 years and 3 months newer
- Up to 57% cheaper – $26.99 vs $63.33
- Up to 57% cheaper
- Up to 55% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.14 vs $0.31/FPS
- Up to 55% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 35 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Core i5-650
- Up to 10% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 204 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
186 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
92%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
204 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.33
42%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
45%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $176.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
