In Atomfall, the Core i3-4150T is slightly faster than the Core i5-3570K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $47 cheaper!
Core i3-4150T
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 196 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 1 day newer – May 01, 2014 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 2 years and 1 day newer
- Up to 64% cheaper – $26.99 vs $74.25
- Up to 64% cheaper
- Up to 66% better value in Atomfall – $0.13 vs $0.38/FPS
- Up to 66% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 35 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
Core i5-3570K
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs Core i5-3570K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
196 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
147 FPS
100%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Core i5-3570K
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
192 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
98%
Price, $
$74.25
36%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
34%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i5-3570K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i5-3570K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-3570K
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3570K Apr 29th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Released | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $212.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 77 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
