In Rust, the Core i3-4150T is slightly faster than the Core i5-2500K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $136 cheaper!
Core i3-4150T
- Up to 1% faster in Rust – 214 vs 211 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Rust
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – May 01, 2014 vs Jan 09, 2011
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
- Up to 83% cheaper – $26.99 vs $162.97
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 84% better value in Rust – $0.12 vs $0.77/FPS
- Up to 84% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Core i5-2500K
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150T vs Core i5-2500K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
214 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
100%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
211 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
43 FPS
93%
Price, $
$162.97
16%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
16%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i5-2500K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150T vs Core i5-2500K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150T May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-2500K Jan 9th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | $216.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
