In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i3-4150 is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 1600X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4150
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 54 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 4% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 117 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer – Apr 11, 2017 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150 vs Ryzen 5 1600X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 1600X
Apr 11th, 2017
Average FPS
117 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
84 FPS
100%
Price, $
$97.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150 vs Ryzen 5 1600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150 vs Ryzen 5 1600X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Ryzen 5 1600X
Apr 11th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 1600X Apr 11th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $249.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM4 |
54W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
