The Core i3-4150 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-6100 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $9.63 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i3-4150
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the FX-6100
- Up to 25% cheaper – $29.65 vs $39.28
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 6 vs 4 threads
Core i3-4150 vs FX-6100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-4150
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
179
100%
Min 1% FPS
119
100%
Price, $
$39.28
75%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
81%
Core i3-4150 vs FX-6100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150 vs FX-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150 vs FX-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-4150 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $117.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
54 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
