In Atomfall, the Core i3-4150 is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4150
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer – Jan 15, 2025 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150 vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 15th, 2025
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$560
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
25%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 15th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 15th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 15th, 2025 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1851 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
