In Rust, the Core i3-4150 is slightly slower than the Core i9-7920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4150
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 54 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-7920X
- Up to 7% faster in Rust – 231 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Rust
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Sep 10, 2017 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150 vs Core i9-7920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Average FPS
231 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
58 FPS
100%
Price, $
$246.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150 vs Core i9-7920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150 vs Core i9-7920X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
18%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-7920X Sep 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Sep 10th, 2017 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $1,199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA2066 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
