In Atomfall, the Core i3-4150 is slightly slower than the Core i7-6800K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4150
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 54 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-6800K
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 207 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer – May 31, 2016 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150 vs Core i7-6800K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-6800K
May 31st, 2016
Average FPS
207 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
100%
Price, $
$228.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150 vs Core i7-6800K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150 vs Core i7-6800K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Core i7-6800K
May 31st, 2016
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6800K May 31st, 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | May 31st, 2016 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $434.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
