In Atomfall, the Core i3-4150 is slightly faster than the Core i7-3970X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4150
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 200 vs 194 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer – May 01, 2014 vs Nov 01, 2012
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 54 vs 150 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-3970X
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150 vs Core i7-3970X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-3970X
Nov 1st, 2012
Average FPS
194 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
146 FPS
97%
Price, $
$175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150 vs Core i7-3970X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150 vs Core i7-3970X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i7-3970X
Nov 1st, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-3970X Nov 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Released | Nov 1st, 2012 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $990.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA2011 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
