In GRID, the Core i3-4150 is same performance as the Core i7-10700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4150
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
GRID FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150 vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
485 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
292 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $117.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
