In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i3-4150 is slightly slower than the Core i5-9600K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4150
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 54 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
Core i5-9600K
- Up to 8% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 104 vs 96 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150 vs Core i5-9600K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
104 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
76 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150 vs Core i5-9600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150 vs Core i5-9600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9600K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| $117.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
