Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 2805 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Core i3-4150
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i3-12100 - $23.29 vs $113.99
- Up to 77% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-12100 - $0.20 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100 - 54 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-4150 - 130 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $23.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
Buy for $113.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4150 | vs | Core i3-12100 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 60 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |