In Dead Space, the Core i3-4150 is slightly slower than the Core i3-10105F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4150
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-10105F
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space – 176 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Core i3-4150 vs Core i3-10105F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
176 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
92 FPS
100%
Price, $
$109
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4150 vs Core i3-10105F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4150 vs Core i3-10105F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4150
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4150 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $117.00 | MSRP | $97.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
