In Rust, the Core i3-4130T is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 1600X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $74 cheaper!
Core i3-4130T
- Up to 76% cheaper – $23.99 vs $97.99
- Up to 76% cheaper
- Up to 75% better value in Rust – $0.11 vs $0.44/FPS
- Up to 75% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 3% faster in Rust – 220 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Rust
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Apr 11, 2017 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130T vs Ryzen 5 1600X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
213 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
45 FPS
88%
Price, $
$23.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 1600X
Apr 11th, 2017
Average FPS
220 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
51 FPS
100%
Price, $
$97.99
24%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
25%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130T vs Ryzen 5 1600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130T vs Ryzen 5 1600X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 1600X
Apr 11th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130T Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 1600X Apr 11th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $249.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM4 |
35W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
