Header Background
Background
Background
Background
FPS Calculator Background

Core i3-4130T vs FX-8370: Baldur's Gate 3

vs
FPS Winner

In Baldur's Gate 3, the Core i3-4130T is slightly slower than the FX-8370. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.

Core i3-4130T

  • Consumes up to 72% less energy35 vs 125 Watts
  • Consumes up to 72% less energy

FX-8370

  • Up to 1% faster in Baldur's Gate 3 – 131 vs 130 FPS
  • Up to 1% faster in Baldur's Gate 3
  • Is 1 year newerSep 02, 2014 vs Sep 01, 2013
  • Is 1 year newer

Baldur's Gate 3 FPS Calculator

Core i3-4130T vs FX-8370: Comparison of performance and price

Synthetic Benchmarks

The Core i3-4130T vs FX-8370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks

Intel Core i3-4130T Logo

Core i3-4130T

Sep 1st, 2013


Geekbench 6 Single-Core

930

100%

Geekbench 6 Multi-Core

1840

86%

AMD FX-8370 Logo

FX-8370

Sep 2nd, 2014


Geekbench 6 Single-Core

520

56%

Geekbench 6 Multi-Core

2134

100%

Performance Specifications

The Core i3-4130T vs FX-8370 in core CPU performance specifications

Intel Core i3-4130T Logo

Core i3-4130T

Sep 1st, 2013


Cores

2-core

25%

L3 Cache

3 MB

38%


Base Frequency

2.9 GHz

72%

Turbo Frequency

GHz

Max. DDR3 RAM Speed

MHz

AMD FX-8370 Logo

FX-8370

Sep 2nd, 2014


Cores

8-core

100%

L3 Cache

8 MB

100%


Base Frequency

4 GHz

100%

Turbo Frequency

4.3 GHz

100%

Max. DDR3 RAM Speed

1866 MHz

100%

Specifications

Comparison of core specifications

Intel Core i3-4130T Logo

Core i3-4130T

Sep 1st, 2013

Specifications

Comparison of core specifications

AMD FX-8370 Logo

FX-8370

Sep 2nd, 2014

Core i3-4130T and FX-8370 Alternatives

Compare CPU with the best gaming CPUs in every price tier

6 items
FPS Calculator Background

Core i3-4130T vs FX-8370 in Other Games

The FPS you'll get in other games, click on a game to view it

124 items

TOP 1 for Price

TOP 2+ for Price

TOP 3+ for Price

Found  CPUs

Popularity
Only Saved Items
Only Saved Items