In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-4130T is slightly slower than the FX-8350. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $234 cheaper!
Core i3-4130T
- Is 10 months and 8 days newer – Sep 01, 2013 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 10 months and 8 days newer
- Up to 91% cheaper – $23.99 vs $258.02
- Up to 91% cheaper
- Up to 91% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.12 vs $1.29/FPS
- Up to 91% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
FX-8350
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 199 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130T vs FX-8350: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
187 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
94%
Price, $
$23.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
199 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
100%
Price, $
$258.02
9%
Value, $/FPS
$1.29/FPS
9%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130T vs FX-8350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130T vs FX-8350 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130T Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8350 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM3+ |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
