In Rust, the Core i3-4130T is slightly faster than the FX-8300 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $82 cheaper!
Core i3-4130T
- Up to 2% faster in Rust – 213 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Rust
- Is 10 months and 8 days newer – Sep 01, 2013 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 10 months and 8 days newer
- Up to 77% cheaper – $23.99 vs $106.06
- Up to 77% cheaper
- Up to 78% better value in Rust – $0.11 vs $0.50/FPS
- Up to 78% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
FX-8300
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130T vs FX-8300: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
213 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
45 FPS
100%
Price, $
$23.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
208 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
91%
Price, $
$106.06
22%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
22%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130T vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130T vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130T Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM3+ |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
