In Rust, the Core i3-4130T is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $256 cheaper!
Core i3-4130T
- Up to 91% cheaper – $23.99 vs $280.00
- Up to 91% cheaper
- Up to 91% better value in Rust – $0.11 vs $1.18/FPS
- Up to 91% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900F
- Up to 11% faster in Rust – 237 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130T vs Core i9-10900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
213 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
45 FPS
71%
Price, $
$23.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
237 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
63 FPS
100%
Price, $
$280
8%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
9%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130T Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $464.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
