In Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, the Core i3-4130T is slightly faster than the Core i7-6700T and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $55 cheaper!
Core i3-4130T
- Up to 2% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – 252 vs 248 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Up to 70% cheaper – $23.99 vs $79.00
- Up to 70% cheaper
- Up to 71% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – $0.09 vs $0.31/FPS
- Up to 71% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Core i7-6700T
- Is 1 year and 11 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 1 year and 11 months newer
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130T vs Core i7-6700T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
252 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
189 FPS
100%
Price, $
$23.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
248 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
98%
Price, $
$79
30%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
29%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i7-6700T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i7-6700T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130T Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6700T Sep 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
