In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-4130T is slightly faster than the Core i7-6700 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $73 cheaper!
Core i3-4130T
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 186 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 75% cheaper – $23.99 vs $97.19
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 78% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.12 vs $0.55/FPS
- Up to 78% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i7-6700
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Jul 01, 2015 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130T vs Core i7-6700: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
186 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
100%
Price, $
$23.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Average FPS
176 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
132 FPS
94%
Price, $
$97.19
24%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
22%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i7-6700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i7-6700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130T Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6700 Jul 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jul 1st, 2015 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
