In Rust, the Core i3-4130T is slightly faster than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4130T
- Up to 2% faster in Rust – 213 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Rust
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Sep 01, 2013 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
Core i7-620M
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130T vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
213 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
45 FPS
100%
Price, $
$23.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130T Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $332.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
